6598. path-bag
Lexical Summary
path-bag: Delicacy, portion, choice food

Original Word: פַתְבַּג
Part of Speech: Noun Masculine
Transliteration: pathbag
Pronunciation: path-bag
Phonetic Spelling: (pathbag')
KJV: portion (provision) of meat
NASB: choice food
Word Origin: [of Persian origin]

1. a dainty

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
portion provision of meat

Of Persian origin; a dainty -- portion (provision) of meat.

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
of foreign origin
Definition
portion, delicacies
NASB Translation
choice food (6).

Brown-Driver-Briggs
[מַּתבָּֿג] (read always [מַּתְבָּג]) noun [masculine] portion (of food) for king, delicacies (Persian loanword, compare Sanskrit prati-bhâga, Zend [pati-baga; whence] Greek transliteration ποτί-βαζις, Syriac ; GildemZKM iv. 213 f. LagGes. Abh.73 BevDn DrDn); — construct מַּתבַּֿג הַמֶּלֶךְ Daniel 1:5,8,13,15, suffix מַּתבָּֿגָם Daniel 1:16, אֹכְלֵי פַתבָּֿגוֺ Daniel 11:26.

Topical Lexicon
Meaning and Scope of the Term

פַתְבַּג refers to choice food supplied from a royal table—luxurious provisions that carried the weight of political favor and cultural identity. In every occurrence it designates fare served under Persian authority, distinguishing it from ordinary rations.

Occurrences in Scripture

Daniel 1:5, 8, 13, 15, 16 record the term in the narrative of Daniel and his three friends in Babylon.
Daniel 11:26 places it in a prophecy of the later conflicts of Hellenistic kings.

Historical and Cultural Background

Sharing royal cuisine in the Ancient Near East signified covenant loyalty. To eat the king’s delicacies was to acknowledge dependence on his patronage and, by extension, his gods. Persian courts were renowned for exotic meats, rich sauces, and wine mixed with spices. Such fare was often dedicated to deities before consumption, creating moral tension for faithful Israelites subject to exile.

Theological Themes

1. Covenant Faithfulness in Exile

“Daniel resolved that he would not defile himself with the king’s food” (Daniel 1:8). Refusing פַתְבַּג became an outward sign of inward allegiance to the covenant. Holiness is portrayed as practical, bodily obedience in hostile culture.

2. God’s Preservation of the Remnant

After ten days of vegetables and water, “they looked healthier and better nourished than any of the young men eating the king’s food” (Daniel 1:15). Physical vigor is shown to be the direct outcome of divine favor rather than human luxury.

3. Treachery at the King’s Table

Daniel 11:26 prophesies that “those who eat his provisions will seek to destroy him.” The same sumptuous fare that tested the faith of Daniel becomes the context for betrayal in later history, underscoring that trust placed in political alliances is fragile.

Pastoral and Practical Implications

• Discernment and Conviction: Modern believers face cultural enticements that appear harmless yet carry spiritual compromise. Daniel models prayerful evaluation and respectful negotiation (Daniel 1:12).
• Bodily Stewardship: Nutrition becomes a venue for worship when choices are made to honor God rather than appetite (compare 1 Corinthians 10:31).
• Community Accountability: Daniel stands with companions. Mutual support strengthens resolve when resisting conformity.
• Fasting and Spiritual Formation: The “ten-day test” anticipates later biblical fasting practices, reminding the church that abstinence can sharpen witness and deepen dependence on God.

Christological and Eschatological Connections

Daniel’s refusal of the royal table anticipates the Messiah who, though offered “all the kingdoms of the world and their glory” (Matthew 4:8), chose obedience over indulgence. The treachery of table-companions in Daniel 11:26 foreshadows Judas at the Supper (Luke 22:21). Both strands converge in Revelation’s promise of the marriage supper of the Lamb (Revelation 19:9), where the redeemed will feast without fear of defilement or betrayal.

Summary

פַתְבַּג is more than exotic cuisine; it is a symbol of allegiance, a crucible of faith, and a prophetic motif. Whether in the disciplined refusal of Daniel or the treacherous plots of future courts, royal delicacies expose the heart. Scripture employs the term to call God’s people to steadfast holiness while awaiting the flawless feast prepared by the true King.

Forms and Transliterations
בְּפַתְבַּ֥ג בַּ֤ג בָּג֛וֹ בג בגו בפתבג פַּתְבַּ֣ג פַּתְבַּ֥ג פַּתְבָּגָ֔ם פתבג פתבגם bā·ḡōw bag baḡ baGo bāḡōw bə·p̄aṯ·baḡ befatBag bəp̄aṯbaḡ paṯ·bā·ḡām paṯ·baḡ patBag paṯbaḡ patbaGam paṯbāḡām
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Daniel 1:5
HEB: בְּיוֹמ֗וֹ מִפַּת־ בַּ֤ג הַמֶּ֙לֶךְ֙ וּמִיֵּ֣ין
NAS: from the king's choice food and from the wine
KJV: of the king's meat, and of the wine
INT: A daily A daily choice the king's the wine

Daniel 1:8
HEB: לֹֽא־ יִתְגָּאַ֛ל בְּפַתְבַּ֥ג הַמֶּ֖לֶךְ וּבְיֵ֣ין
NAS: himself with the king's choice food or with the wine
KJV: of the king's meat, nor with the wine
INT: not defile choice the king's the wine

Daniel 1:13
HEB: הָאֹ֣כְלִ֔ים אֵ֖ת פַּתְבַּ֣ג הַמֶּ֑לֶךְ וְכַאֲשֶׁ֣ר
NAS: the king's choice food; and deal
KJV: of the king's meat: and as thou seest,
INT: of the youths are eating choice the king's who

Daniel 1:15
HEB: הָאֹ֣כְלִ֔ים אֵ֖ת פַּתְבַּ֥ג הַמֶּֽלֶךְ׃
NAS: the king's choice food.
KJV: the portion of the king's meat.
INT: the youths had been eating choice the king's

Daniel 1:16
HEB: נֹשֵׂא֙ אֶת־ פַּתְבָּגָ֔ם וְיֵ֖ין מִשְׁתֵּיהֶ֑ם
NAS: to withhold their choice food and the wine
KJV: took away the portion of their meat, and the wine
INT: the overseer to withhold their choice and the wine drink

Daniel 11:26
HEB: וְאֹכְלֵ֧י פַת־ בָּג֛וֹ יִשְׁבְּר֖וּהוּ וְחֵיל֣וֹ
NAS: Those who eat his choice food will destroy
KJV: Yea, they that feed of the portion of his meat shall destroy
INT: eat his choice will destroy and his army

6 Occurrences

Strong's Hebrew 6598
6 Occurrences


baḡ — 1 Occ.
bā·ḡōw — 1 Occ.
bə·p̄aṯ·baḡ — 1 Occ.
paṯ·baḡ — 2 Occ.
paṯ·bā·ḡām — 1 Occ.

6597
Top of Page
Top of Page