Lexical Summary path-bag: Delicacy, portion, choice food Original Word: פַתְבַּג Strong's Exhaustive Concordance portion provision of meat Of Persian origin; a dainty -- portion (provision) of meat. NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Originof foreign origin Definition portion, delicacies NASB Translation choice food (6). Brown-Driver-Briggs [מַּתבָּֿג] (read always [מַּתְבָּג]) noun [masculine] portion (of food) for king, delicacies (Persian loanword, compare Sanskrit prati-bhâga, Zend [pati-baga; whence] Greek transliteration ποτί-βαζις, Syriac ![]() Topical Lexicon Meaning and Scope of the Term פַתְבַּג refers to choice food supplied from a royal table—luxurious provisions that carried the weight of political favor and cultural identity. In every occurrence it designates fare served under Persian authority, distinguishing it from ordinary rations. Occurrences in Scripture • Daniel 1:5, 8, 13, 15, 16 record the term in the narrative of Daniel and his three friends in Babylon. Historical and Cultural Background Sharing royal cuisine in the Ancient Near East signified covenant loyalty. To eat the king’s delicacies was to acknowledge dependence on his patronage and, by extension, his gods. Persian courts were renowned for exotic meats, rich sauces, and wine mixed with spices. Such fare was often dedicated to deities before consumption, creating moral tension for faithful Israelites subject to exile. Theological Themes 1. Covenant Faithfulness in Exile “Daniel resolved that he would not defile himself with the king’s food” (Daniel 1:8). Refusing פַתְבַּג became an outward sign of inward allegiance to the covenant. Holiness is portrayed as practical, bodily obedience in hostile culture. 2. God’s Preservation of the Remnant After ten days of vegetables and water, “they looked healthier and better nourished than any of the young men eating the king’s food” (Daniel 1:15). Physical vigor is shown to be the direct outcome of divine favor rather than human luxury. 3. Treachery at the King’s Table Daniel 11:26 prophesies that “those who eat his provisions will seek to destroy him.” The same sumptuous fare that tested the faith of Daniel becomes the context for betrayal in later history, underscoring that trust placed in political alliances is fragile. Pastoral and Practical Implications • Discernment and Conviction: Modern believers face cultural enticements that appear harmless yet carry spiritual compromise. Daniel models prayerful evaluation and respectful negotiation (Daniel 1:12). Christological and Eschatological Connections Daniel’s refusal of the royal table anticipates the Messiah who, though offered “all the kingdoms of the world and their glory” (Matthew 4:8), chose obedience over indulgence. The treachery of table-companions in Daniel 11:26 foreshadows Judas at the Supper (Luke 22:21). Both strands converge in Revelation’s promise of the marriage supper of the Lamb (Revelation 19:9), where the redeemed will feast without fear of defilement or betrayal. Summary פַתְבַּג is more than exotic cuisine; it is a symbol of allegiance, a crucible of faith, and a prophetic motif. Whether in the disciplined refusal of Daniel or the treacherous plots of future courts, royal delicacies expose the heart. Scripture employs the term to call God’s people to steadfast holiness while awaiting the flawless feast prepared by the true King. Forms and Transliterations בְּפַתְבַּ֥ג בַּ֤ג בָּג֛וֹ בג בגו בפתבג פַּתְבַּ֣ג פַּתְבַּ֥ג פַּתְבָּגָ֔ם פתבג פתבגם bā·ḡōw bag baḡ baGo bāḡōw bə·p̄aṯ·baḡ befatBag bəp̄aṯbaḡ paṯ·bā·ḡām paṯ·baḡ patBag paṯbaḡ patbaGam paṯbāḡāmLinks Interlinear Greek • Interlinear Hebrew • Strong's Numbers • Englishman's Greek Concordance • Englishman's Hebrew Concordance • Parallel TextsEnglishman's Concordance Daniel 1:5 HEB: בְּיוֹמ֗וֹ מִפַּת־ בַּ֤ג הַמֶּ֙לֶךְ֙ וּמִיֵּ֣ין NAS: from the king's choice food and from the wine KJV: of the king's meat, and of the wine INT: A daily A daily choice the king's the wine Daniel 1:8 Daniel 1:13 Daniel 1:15 Daniel 1:16 Daniel 11:26 6 Occurrences |