Lexical Summary Tartaq: Tartak Original Word: תַּרְתָּק Strong's Exhaustive Concordance Tartak Of foreign derivation; Tartak, a deity of the Avvites -- Tartak. NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Originof foreign origin Definition a god of the Avvites NASB Translation Tartak (1). Brown-Driver-Briggs תַּרְתָּ֑ק proper name, of a divinity of הָעַוִּים, 2 Kings 17:31; Θαρθακ; not identified, compare PinchesHast. DB TARTAK. תְּשׂוּמֶת see שׂום. [תְּשֻׁאָה] see II. שׁוא. תּשָׁב see תּוֺשָׁב below ישׁב. תִּשְׁבִּי see שׁבה. תַּשְׁבֵּץ see [שׁבץ]. [תְּשׁוּבָה] see שׁוב. תשׁוה Job 30:22 see [תְשֻׁאָה] below II. שׁוא. תְּשׁוּעָה, תְּשֻׁעָה see ישׁע. תְּשׁוּקָה see III. שׁוק. תְּשׁוּרָה see I. תֻּשִׁיָּה see תּוּשִׁיָּה below ישִׁה. Topical Lexicon Biblical Occurrence Tartak is mentioned once in Scripture, in the list of foreign deities brought into Samaria after the Assyrian deportation of the northern kingdom: “the Avites made Nibhaz and Tartak” (2 Kings 17:31). His placement among other pagan gods underscores the religious syncretism that followed Israel’s exile. Historical Background The Avites were one of five peoples transplanted by the Assyrians (2 Kings 17:24). Archaeology connects “Avva” with regions along the Euphrates, an area saturated with Mesopotamian religion. Though Tartak’s precise identity is debated, contemporaneous iconography suggests a deity with animal features, possibly donkey- or dog-headed, fitting the grotesque nature of many Mesopotamian idols. Monarch-controlled resettlements routinely exported local gods, believing the divine entourage would secure prosperity in new lands. Thus Tartak traveled with the Avites into Israel’s vacated cities. The Avites and Their Gods 2 Kings 17 records a spectrum of idols: Succoth-Benoth (from Babylon), Nergal (from Cuth), Ashima (from Hamath), Nibhaz and Tartak (from Avva), and Adrammelech and Anammelech (from Sepharvaim). Each name epitomized the polytheistic worldview that Israel had been warned to shun (Deuteronomy 12:31). Tartak’s inclusion illustrates how quickly idolatry returned to a land once dedicated to the LORD (2 Kings 17:34-35). Theological Implications 1. Idolatry’s Persistence: Even after divine judgment, the human heart gravitates to replacement deities (Jeremiah 17:9). Tartak serves as a historical marker of that tendency. Ministry Applications • Discernment in Missions: Modern gospel workers often encounter local deities syncretized with nominal Christianity. Tartak’s account cautions against permitting cultural idols to coexist with biblical faith. Christological Harmony Where Israel faltered, Christ triumphed. In the wilderness He repudiated Satan’s offer of idolatrous power (Matthew 4:9-10), fulfilling the command Israel—and later the Samaritans—had ignored. By His cross He “disarmed the powers and authorities” (Colossians 2:15), ensuring that gods like Tartak hold no authority over those in Him. Related Scriptures • Exodus 20:3-5; Deuteronomy 6:14; Psalm 115:4-8 – Foundational prohibitions against idols Tartak’s lone biblical appearance thus magnifies enduring themes: the deceitfulness of idols, the necessity of pure worship, and the ultimate victory of the one true God. Forms and Transliterations תַּרְתָּ֑ק תרתק tar·tāq tarTak tartāqLinks Interlinear Greek • Interlinear Hebrew • Strong's Numbers • Englishman's Greek Concordance • Englishman's Hebrew Concordance • Parallel TextsEnglishman's Concordance 2 Kings 17:31 HEB: נִבְחַ֖ז וְאֶת־ תַּרְתָּ֑ק וְהַסְפַרְוִ֗ים שֹׂרְפִ֤ים NAS: Nibhaz and Tartak; and the Sepharvites KJV: Nibhaz and Tartak, and the Sepharvites INT: made Nibhaz and Tartak and the Sepharvites burned 1 Occurrence |