Lexical Summary hairetikos: Heretical, factious Original Word: αἱρετικός Strong's Exhaustive Concordance heretic. From the same as hairetizo; a schismatic -- heretic (the Greek word itself). see GREEK hairetizo HELPS Word-studies Cognate: 141 hairetikós (an adjective, derived from 138 /hairéomai, "to choose, have a distinctive opinion") – a factious person, specializing in half-truths and misimpressions "to win others over" to their personal opinion (misguided zeal) – while creating harmful divisions (used only in Tit 3:10). See 139 (hairesis). NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Originfrom haireó Definition causing division NASB Translation factious (1). Thayer's Greek Lexicon STRONGS NT 141: αἱρετικόςαἱρετικός, (ή, (see αἱρέω); 1. fitted or able to take or choose a thing; rare in secular authors. 2. schismatic, factious, a follower of false doctrine: Titus 3:10. Topical Lexicon Biblical Context Titus 3:10 presents the sole New Testament appearance of the adjective translated “divisive” (BSB: “Reject a divisive man after a first and second admonition”). The letter exhorts Titus, as a pastoral delegate on Crete, to organize congregations around sound doctrine and to silence those who upset households with false teaching (Titus 1:10-11, Titus 2:1). The instruction in 3:10-11 provides a measured, orderly process: (1) warn, (2) warn again, (3) separate if unrepentant. The verse lies within Paul’s wider call to maintain good works and avoid “foolish controversies” (Titus 3:9), underscoring that persistent promotion of error is not merely an intellectual issue but a practical threat to the unity and witness of the church. Theological Significance 1. Doctrine and Unity: Scripture consistently joins purity of teaching with harmony of fellowship. Titus 3:10 shows that unity must rest on truth; where truth is stubbornly resisted, separation may become a pastoral duty (see also Romans 16:17; 2 John 10-11). Historical Background Early Christian communities faced pressures from Judaizing legalists, emerging Gnostic speculations, and syncretistic myths. The word later became a technical term for “heretic” in post-apostolic literature, featuring prominently in writings of Irenaeus and Tertullian against Marcion and assorted Gnostics. Church councils eventually formalized creedal boundaries, but Titus 3:10 already sets the pastoral pattern: patient instruction, followed by decisive action when foundational doctrine is denied. Pastoral and Ministry Implications • Establish clear teaching: Elders must be “holding firmly to the trustworthy word as taught” (Titus 1:9) so that warnings rest on Scripture, not personal preference. Related Concepts in Scripture • “Works of the flesh… dissensions, factions” (Galatians 5:19-21) show division as fruit of the sinful nature. Application for Modern Believers In an age of doctrinal relativism, Titus 3:10 summons congregations to exercise loving discernment. Tolerance should never eclipse truth, yet discipline must serve redemption rather than vindictiveness. Churches are urged to (1) cultivate theological clarity, (2) engage erring members with compassion and Scripture, (3) employ formal separation only when Christ’s gospel is persistently contradicted, and (4) pursue restoration where repentance occurs. Summary Strong’s Greek 141 highlights the gravity of willful doctrinal division. Paul’s counsel to Titus models a balance of patience, truth, and decisive action that continues to guide faithful church life. Forms and Transliterations αιρετικον αιρετικόν αἱρετικὸν αιρετώτεραι αιρετώτερον airetikon hairetikon hairetikònLinks Interlinear Greek • Interlinear Hebrew • Strong's Numbers • Englishman's Greek Concordance • Englishman's Hebrew Concordance • Parallel Texts |