151. aischrotés
Lexical Summary
aischrotés: Obscenity, filthiness, shamefulness

Original Word: αἰσχρότης
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: aischrotés
Pronunciation: ahee-skhró-tace
Phonetic Spelling: (ahee-skhrot'-ace)
KJV: filthiness
NASB: filthiness
Word Origin: [from G150 (αἰσχρός - disgraceful)]

1. shamefulness, i.e. obscenity

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
filthiness.

From aischros; shamefulness, i.e. Obscenity -- filthiness.

see GREEK aischros

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from aischros
Definition
baseness
NASB Translation
filthiness (1).

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 151: αἰσχρότης

αἰσχρότης, (ητος, , baseness, dishonor: Ephesians 5:4 (A. V. filthiness). (Plato, Gorgias 525 a.)

Topical Lexicon
Definition in Context

The noun αἰσχρότης occurs once in the Greek New Testament, in Ephesians 5:4, where it labels speech or behavior that is morally ugly, disgraceful, or shame-inducing. Paul places it in a catalogue of verbal sins that believers must repudiate.

Scriptural Context

“Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk, or crude joking, which are out of character, but rather thanksgiving” (Ephesians 5:4).
• The placement follows prohibitions of sexual immorality and impurity (Ephesians 5:3) and precedes the call to live as “children of light” (Ephesians 5:8). Obscene speech is therefore treated as a fruit of darkness, inconsistent with the believer’s new identity in Christ.
• Thanksgiving is presented as the godly antithesis to αἰσχρότης, showing that holy speech not only avoids corruption but actively glorifies God.

Greco-Roman Background

In classical and Hellenistic literature, αἰσχρότης described shameful actions or words that violated accepted social decorum. Public rhetoric valued wit but despised vulgarity, especially in the presence of women or the gods. Paul leverages this cultural sensitivity yet grounds his appeal not in societal propriety but in the holiness required of the saints.

Hebraic Roots and Septuagint Parallels

Though the specific noun is absent from the Septuagint, its concept echoes the Hebrew aversion to “unclean lips” (Isaiah 6:5) and to “perverse speech” (Proverbs 4:24). The prophets repeatedly link impure words with covenant unfaithfulness (Jeremiah 23:36; Ezekiel 22:9). Paul’s warning therefore harmonizes with the broader biblical witness that the mouth reveals the heart (Proverbs 10:20; Matthew 12:34).

Relation to Companion Vices

Ephesians 5:4 pairs αἰσχρότης with “foolish talk” (μωρολογία) and “crude joking” (εὐτραπελία). Together they form a spectrum:
• Obscenity—content that is morally defiling.
• Foolish talk—speech devoid of wisdom or reverence.
• Crude joking—humor that trivializes sin.

Comparable lists include Colossians 3:8 (“filthy language”), Romans 1:29-32 (“malice… insolent, arrogant, boastful”), and James 3:6 (“the tongue is a fire”). The consistent message is that verbal impurity stands alongside overt acts of wickedness and must be mortified.

Christological and Ecclesiological Significance

Believers are members of Christ’s body (Ephesians 5:30). Obscene speech therefore defiles not merely the individual but the corporate temple of God. By contrast, sanctified tongues participate in the church’s priestly ministry of praise (Hebrews 13:15) and mutual edification (Ephesians 4:29).

Pastoral Application

1. Personal Holiness: Guarding speech is integral to walking “worthy of the calling” (Ephesians 4:1).
2. Discipleship: New converts often need targeted teaching on speech habits shaped by former lifestyles.
3. Church Discipline: Persistent verbal uncleanness, like sexual immorality, may require corrective action to protect the flock (1 Corinthians 5:11-13).
4. Worship: Replacing obscenity with thanksgiving cultivates a God-centered outlook, transforming both private devotion and corporate gatherings.

Witness and Mission

Pure speech bears witness to the transformative power of the gospel before an unbelieving culture that prizes shock value. As Jesus said, “Let your light shine before men” (Matthew 5:16); one way that light shines is through words “seasoned with salt” (Colossians 4:6).

Patristic Reception

Early Christian writers emphasized the deadly seriousness of verbal impurity. Chrysostom, commenting on Ephesians, warned that corrupt talk “makes the very soul sordid.” Clement of Alexandria urged believers to “banish foul language” as incompatible with the Logos dwelling within.

Contemporary Relevance

Digital media, entertainment, and workplace banter amplify the temptation toward αἰσχρότης. The apostolic command still speaks with clarity: followers of Christ must reject participation in verbal filth, whether spoken, typed, or streamed, and replace it with speech that honors God and builds others up.

Summary

αἰσχρότης identifies content that disgraces both speaker and hearer. Rooted in biblical calls to moral purity, Paul’s singular use of the term underscores the inseparability of heart and tongue. The redeemed community manifests its new life in Christ not only by abstaining from sexual immorality but also by consecrating every word to the service of thanksgiving and truth.

Forms and Transliterations
αισχροτης αισχρότης αἰσχρότης αισχρώς aischrotes aischrotēs aischrótes aischrótēs
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Ephesians 5:4 N-NFS
GRK: καὶ αἰσχρότης καὶ μωρολογία
NAS: and [there must be no] filthiness and silly talk,
KJV: Neither filthiness, nor
INT: and filthiness and foolish talking

Strong's Greek 151
1 Occurrence


αἰσχρότης — 1 Occ.

150
Top of Page
Top of Page